Skip to main content

Argumentation and Advocacy

General

Prefix

CMST

Course Number

318

Course Level

Undergraduate

Department/Unit(s)

College/School

College of Liberal Arts

Description

Construction and critique of reasoned discourse and advocacy.

Credits

Min

3

Max

3

Repeatable

No

Goals and Diversity

MN Goal Course

Yes

MN Goal Designation(s)

02

Cultural Diversity

No

Learning Outcomes

Outcome

Distinguish between discourse that contains reasoning and that which does not.

Outcome

Distinguish between different types of reasoning.

Outcome

Analyze arguments, distinguishing premises and conclusions.

Outcome

Evaluate inductive and deductive reasoning.

Outcome

Apply basic logical techniques.

Outcome

Identify and avoid fallacies in reasoning.

Outcome

Define and apply the concepts of status quo, burden of proof, prima facie case, and burden of rejoinder as they pertain to debating public controversies.

Outcome

Write central questions expressing controversies around questions of fact, value and policy.

Outcome

Prepare and debate a policy controversy utilizing the stock issues of ill, blame, cure, and cost.

Outcome

Judge and critique a classroom debate centering on a policy controversy.

Course Outline

Course Outline

Argumentation theory, form, and practice. 25% Research and analysis of topics. 10% Critical thinking and listening. 10% Writing, editing, and refinement of delivery. 30% In class delivery and critique of advocacy. 20% Principles of civil discourse and communication ethics. 5%

Dependencies

Programs

CMST318 is a completion requirement for: